{"id":749,"date":"2018-09-11T13:50:52","date_gmt":"2018-09-11T18:50:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dandc.com\/?p=749"},"modified":"2018-09-11T13:50:52","modified_gmt":"2018-09-11T18:50:52","slug":"bombshell-report-indicates-google-tried-to-fix-2016-election-for-pro-abortion-hillary-clinton","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.dandc.com\/?p=749","title":{"rendered":"Bombshell Report Indicates Google Tried to Fix 2016 Election for Pro-Abortion Hillary Clinton"},"content":{"rendered":"

via LifeNews.com<\/a> September 11, 2018 at 12:40PM<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/span>In 2016, some at Google allegedly realized that it had \u201cpolitical power\u201d and tried to flex it against President Trump.<\/p>\n

An exclusive report broken by Fox News\u2019 Tucker Carlson on his show, Tucker Carlson Tonight, \u00a0revealed a disturbing Google email chain<\/a> sent out on November 9, 2016. The first email, \u201cElections results and the Latino vote,\u201d was written by Google\u2019s Multicultural Marketing department head, Eliana Murillo. In the four-page email, Murillo describes how she and her coworkers engaged in \u201cnon-partisan activities\u201d to boost Latino voting turnout. However, Murillo slipped up and admitted that despite Google\u2019s \u201cpolitical power<\/strong>,\u201d only \u201c71% of Latinos voted for Hillary, and that wasn\u2019t enough<\/strong>.\u201d<\/p>\n

At first, the memo had no mention of partisanship. Murillo stated that she and her colleagues \u201cworked very hard\u201d to get the Latino vote \u201cwith our features, our partners, and our voices.\u201d The company used YouTubers, social media events, and a non-partisan campaign focusing on \u201cthe power of the Latino vote.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, the results caught her off guard and showed more about the reality of the campaign. \u201cUltimately, after all was said and done, the Latino community did come out to vote, and completely surprised us,\u201d Murillo said. \u201cWe never anticipated that 29% of Latinos would vote for Trump.\u201d<\/p>\n

Murillo apparently had seen a headline claiming that the early Latino vote meant that \u201cTrump is dead\u201d in the election. She wrote:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cOn a personal note, we really thought we had shown up to demonstrate our political power against a candidate who had vehemently offended our community by calling us rapists and drug dealers. We read the headline and thought WOW, we did it!\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

She continued, \u201cBut then reality set in. Only 71% of Latinos voted for Hillary, and that wasn\u2019t enough.\u201d Murillo then admitted that she was not objective in trying to get the Latino vote, saying that the 2016 results were \u201cdevastating for our Democratic Latino community.\u201d<\/p>\n

SIGN THE PETITION! Attention Facebook, Twitter, Google and YouTube: Stop Censoring Pro-Lifers<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

HOLA, the project created by Google and its partners for the Latino vote, had a thread where people were \u201csharing how much they hurt\u201d after the Trump election. Murillo was worried about contacting her partners over there because \u201csome may actually be Trump supporters.\u201d<\/p>\n

She ended the email with this note, \u201cI\u2019m in shock and it hurts more than I could have ever imagined, but trying to stay optimistic and keep my head high. Loss is a part of life, and I do think frustrations challenge us to work smarter and get creative. My partners have sent notes and are saying the same thing \u2014 time to keep working harder.\u201d In another company email, Google Search Product Marketing official Mackenzie Thomas called Murillo\u2019s work \u201c100% partisan.\u201d<\/p>\n

On his show, Carlson said, \u201cThis wasn\u2019t a get-out-the-vote effort or whatever they say\u2026It was aimed only at one group, a group that Google cynically assumed would vote exclusively for the Democratic party.\u201d<\/p>\n